Delhi Police and Assam Police Reach Pawan Khera’s Residence Following FIR Filed by Rinki Bhuyan Sarma Against Dual‑Passport Allegations

Police Teams Arrive at the Delhi Home of Pawan Khera

Delhi Police and Assam Police jointly reached the address in Delhi identified as the residence of Pawan Khera, who serves as the media and publicity chief for the All India Congress Committee. Both law‑enforcement contingents knocked on the door, verified the address, and proceeded to conduct a thorough sweep of the premises. Despite the coordinated arrival, Pawan Khera was not located inside the dwelling when officers completed their inspection.

According to statements released by the commanding officers, all verification steps were followed, and a formal report documenting the absence of Pawan Khera at the time of the visit was filed. The absence of Pawan Khera at the scene has prompted further inquiries regarding his whereabouts and possible relocation to another city.

Himanta Biswa Sarma Accuses Pawan Khera of Evading Arrest by Fleeing to Hyderabad

Himanta Biswa Sarma, the Chief Minister of Assam, publicly asserted that Pawan Khera has left Delhi and travelled to Hyderabad in an attempt to avoid the legal process initiated against him. Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma described the situation as a deliberate act of evasion, emphasizing that Pawan Khera had previously expressed willingness to be taken into custody.

Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma recounted that just a day prior to the police operation, Pawan Khera allegedly announced a readiness to be arrested, a statement that Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma claims was subsequently contradicted by Pawan Khera’s sudden disappearance. In response, Chief Minister Himanda Biswa Sarma used a rhetorical device, indicating an intention to diminish Pawan Khera’s reputation, and warned that the legal process would continue irrespective of the current location of Pawan Khera.

Background of the Dual‑Passport Allegations

The current police action follows a series of public statements made by Pawan Khera in which he alleged that Rinki Bhuyan Sarma, the spouse of Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, possessed more than one passport. Pawan Khera framed these claims within a broader narrative suggesting potential violations of Indian law that prohibits dual citizenship.

Pawan Khera highlighted documentation that he claimed indicated the existence of multiple passports issued to Rinki Bhuyan Sarma. The insinuation was that the possession of more than one passport might point to a dual‑citizenship status, a condition that Indian statutes expressly forbid for Indian nationals.

Pawan Khera’s allegations extended to a critique of the political ideology of Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, asserting that the alleged possession of passports from two Muslim‑majority nations by Rinki Bhuyan Sarma was incongruent with the public anti‑Muslim narrative associated with Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s political platform.

FIR Lodged by Rinki Bhuyan Sarma

In reaction to the statements made by Pawan Khera, Rinki Bhuyan Sarma filed a First Information Report (FIR) with the local police, alleging defamation and the spread of false information. The FIR specifically named Pawan Khera and outlined the grievance that unverified claims regarding passport holdings were detrimental to the reputation of Rinki Bhuyan Sarma.

The FIR cited sections of the Indian Penal Code that address criminal defamation and the dissemination of false statements. By filing the FIR, Rinki Bhuyan Sarma initiated a formal criminal complaint that mandated police investigation and subsequently led to the deployment of both Delhi Police and Assam Police to the residence of Pawan Khera.

Legal Context of Dual Citizenship in India

Indian law expressly forbids the holding of dual citizenship by Indian nationals. The legal framework governing citizenship is outlined in the Citizenship Act, which delineates the conditions under which citizenship can be acquired, retained, or relinquished. According to the Act, an individual who voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another country automatically loses Indian citizenship.

Within this legal context, the claims made by Pawan Khera regarding the possession of multiple passports by Rinki Bhuyan Sarma, if proven true, would constitute a breach of the Citizenship Act. However, the allegations remain unsubstantiated, and the FIR filed by Rinki Bhuyan Sarma challenges the veracity of those statements.

Responses from the Congress Party

Supriya Srinate, a senior Congress leader, responded to the police presence at the home of Pawan Khera with a pointed statement directed at Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. Supriya Srinate accused Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma of attempting to deflect attention from alleged corruption by targeting Pawan Khera.

In the remark, Supriya Srinate emphasized that the charges of corruption leveled against Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma were serious and that the political tactics employed were intended to intimidate. Supriya Srinate urged a focus on the allegations made by Pawan Khera rather than the use of theatrical language, emphasizing the need for an unbiased legal process.

Implications for Political Discourse in Assam and Nationwide

The episode involving Pawan Khera, Rinki Bhuyan Sarma, and Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma underscores the heightened sensitivity surrounding accusations of dual nationality among political figures in India. The public nature of the allegations, combined with the filing of an FIR, has amplified debate over the ethical responsibilities of media and political operatives when presenting potentially defamatory content.

Furthermore, the coordinated response by Delhi Police and Assam Police illustrates the readiness of law‑enforcement agencies to act on FIRs that arise from politically charged disputes. The involvement of two separate state police forces also highlights inter‑jurisdictional cooperation in matters that intersect personal reputation and public interest.

Current Status and Next Steps

As of the latest update, Pawan Khera remains unlocated at his Delhi residence, and law‑enforcement officials continue to seek information regarding his possible relocation. The investigation initiated by the FIR filed by Rinki Bhuyan Sarma is ongoing, and further legal actions may be pursued based on the findings of Delhi Police and Assam Police.

Both Delhi Police and Assam Police have indicated that they will continue to monitor the situation, maintain contact with relevant authorities, and follow due process to ensure that any legal violations are addressed in accordance with Indian law. The outcome of the investigation will likely influence public perception of both Pawan Khera and Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, as well as shape future discourse on the subject of passport authenticity and dual citizenship.