World

Donald Trump, the Abraham Accords, and the Pakistan Dynamic

Tuesday, May 26, 2026
5 min read
Donald Trump, the Abraham Accords, and the Pakistan Dynamic

That whole thing with Donald Trump, trying to push the Abraham Accords —it really threw a spotlight on Pakistan.

He mentioned the Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir, but he completely skipped Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. It was an embarrassment, plain and simple, for the civilian leadership there.

This happened while Trump was trying to get Muslim-majority nations to join the Accords, tying it all back to those ongoing, tricky talks with Iran.

Trump was talking about negotiations with Iran being “proceeding nicely.” And then he called for a bunch of countries to jump into the Accords. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkiye, Egypt, Jordan.

He listed the heavy hitters he was talking to: Mohammed bin Salman, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, and King Abdullah II. Those are the leaders he brought up.

But Pakistan? They got the Army Chief instead of the Prime Minister.

That omission really stood out. Especially when you think about how these things are supposed to work. Pakistan runs on a parliamentary system, headed by the Prime Minister.

So, mentioning the military chief instead of the elected head of government? It just screamed something. It highlighted the military’s grip on things in Pakistan’s power structure. It felt deeply awkward for Islamabad’s civilian establishment.

It just exposed the dynamic.

And then you have the bigger picture swirling around this whole regional push. Trump was pushing for this expansion of the Accords. He claimed it was going to be a “Historic Event” for the Middle East. He also claimed it already brought major financial and economic gains for the countries that had joined earlier.

The Accords themselves started back when Trump was in office, in 2020. It basically normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations, like the UAE and Bahrain. Morocco and Sudan joined later too.

Now, Trump wanted more. He wanted more Muslim nations in the fold. And he even floated the idea of Iran joining if a deal with Washington sorted itself out.

He was mandatorily requesting everyone sign the Accords. He said, “all Countries immediately sign the Abraham Accords.” And if Iran signed something with the US, he called it an “Honor” for Tehran to join the coalition.

But Pakistan didn't buy into that specific push.

Reuters reported that Pakistan rejected Trump’s idea of joining the Accords. A source familiar with the situation said Trump’s attempt to connect the Iran talks with the Accords was just misplaced.

You can’t ignore the historical friction. Pakistan has never recognized Israel. That issue is just too sensitive, too political, too delicate. It remains a massive sticking point.

And the whole atmosphere is poisoned by the Gaza war. That conflict just makes any kind of normalization impossible.

Public anger across the Muslim world over the military actions in Gaza is huge. It complicated everything.

Saudi Arabia, for example, keeps saying they won't normalize ties with Israel unless there's real progress on Palestinian statehood. That’s the line they hold.

Egypt, Jordan, Turkiye—they already have diplomatic ties with Israel. But those ties? They are stretched thin now, pulled taut by the intensity of the Gaza conflict.

It’s all messy.

Some people, like Trump’s ally Senator Lindsey Graham, seemed to back the idea of linking the Iran deal with regional integration. They argued it could open up huge economic chances.

But analysts? They started questioning the whole strategy. The practicality of Trump’s approach felt shaky.

Ali Vaez, who works on the Iran project over at the International Crisis Group, actually pointed out something critical. He said Trump was trying to frame an Iran aGreement as just another extension of the Abraham Accords strategy. It wasn't just about economics or regional deals. It was a different kind of maneuvering.

It’s not just a neat timeline of events. It’s a mess of power plays. The military reference in Pakistan? That was just one small piece of that larger, much more complicated picture. Everything is tangled up.

Written by Gree News Team — Senior Editorial Board

Gree News Team covers international news and global affairs at Gree News. Our collective of senior editors is dedicated to providing independent, accurate, and responsible journalism for a global audience.

#sensational#world#global#trending

More from World

View All

Latest Headlines