World

India, Press Freedom, and Minority Rights: A Historical and Democratic Context

Monday, May 18, 2026
5 min read
India, Press Freedom, and Minority Rights: A Historical and Democratic Context

India just strongly pushed back against what the Dutch Prime Minister, Rob Jetten, said about press freedom and minority rights there. The core argument was that these concerns stem from a real lack of grasp—a simple misunderstanding—of India’s history, its democracy, and its massive cultural differences.

This whole exchange happened while PM Modi was visiting the Netherlands. Sibi George, the Ministry of External Affairs Secretary (West), stepped in to address some questions raised by a Dutch journalist during a media interaction.

George talked about India being this huge, vibrant democracy. He stressed that it has deep civilisational roots and a long history where different religions just coexisted.

“These questions,” George noted, “they just show a lack of understanding about India.”

He mentioned the Jewish presence, saying it was in India for over two and a half thousand years. He made a point that in India, the Jewish population never really faced persecution.

Christianity also arrived here, and it kept growing. It came to India even before it reached Europe. He mentioned that today, there are about thirty million Christians.

And Islam also arrived, tied to the time of Prophet Muhammad. It flourished here too.

But then the tone shifted a bit. George brought up the fact that minorities have always faced pressure. “Attacked minorities have always come here,” he said during the talk.

The whole interaction kicked off because a journalist asked why there wasn't a joint press interaction during Modi’s two-day trip. That was the initial hook.

George tried to pivot back to the democracy aspect. He pointed to the recent elections. “We had elections. More than ninety percent of the people voted. That’s the beauty of India,” he remarked, emphasizing how peacefully power transferred.

He argued that economic progress didn't require abandoning democracy. It wasn't about violence to fix poverty. It was about using the democratic process.

He made a comparison, trying to frame the context. India represents a huge chunk of the world’s population, but he noted, it doesn’t hold the bulk of the world’s problems.

Then there was the minority shift. He looked at the demographics. When India gained independence, minorities made up about eleven percent of the population. Now? More than twenty percent. He asked the critics to really look and learn about India before judging it.

You have the initial friction, the historical defense, and then the statistical pushback on the minority situation. It just flows unevenly.

There’s also this bit floating around about Jetten himself. It’s not totally clear if he was the one who made those specific remarks directly to the Indian side.

But the Dutch newspaper, De Volkskrant, reported that Jetten had reportedly voiced concerns to the Indian government beforehand. Things like press freedom and minority rights were on the table.

And then there was that social media post Jetten made.

Written by Gree News Team — Senior Editorial Board

Gree News Team covers international news and global affairs at Gree News. Our collective of senior editors is dedicated to providing independent, accurate, and responsible journalism for a global audience.

#sensational#world#global#trending

More from World

View All

Latest Headlines