Top News

Salary Manipulation and Ethical Debate in Job Seeking

Thursday, May 28, 2026
5 min read
Salary Manipulation and Ethical Debate in Job Seeking

An Instagram post blew up recently. It was this guy, Anmol Garg , showing a screenshot. It claimed he had edited his payslip. Turned a four lakh annual salary into a twelve lakh offer.

The whole thing started when he shared a message from someone anonymous. It was the core of the controversy.

In that message, the guy laid out his strategy. He admitted he edited his payslip. He inflated his salary from four lakh to seven lakh. Why? To try and negotiate a better deal while switching jobs.

Apparently, the trick worked for him. He told recruiters he needed a twenty percent hike. After that, the company gave him an offer of eight point five lakh per annum.

He used that offer letter in another interview. And finally, he landed a package of twelve lakh annually.

The actual text of the message was pretty blunt. It read something like, “Bhaiyya maine payslip edit karwake 4 lakh ki salary ko 7 bana di… company ko bola 20% hike chahiye to jump… unhone 8.5 ka offer letter diya… ye offer letter dikhake maine ek aur company ka interview crack kiya aur finally 12 ka offer aaya hai.”

Anmol Garg shared this screenshot online. He captioned it simply, “Bhagwaan sab dekh raha hai.” It felt like he was signaling something, disapproval mixed with a hint of something else. Ethical stuff, maybe.

But the internet just exploded with reactions. It got deeply divided.

The Reactions and Counterarguments

Some people immediately slammed the move. They called it dishonest. Fraudulent.

Then you had the counterargument. Others argued that the companies themselves were the problem. They said companies already underpay people. They rely too much on old salary history when they hire.

One comment was pure sarcasm. “This is so unethical! Please provide the editor number.”

Then you saw the defense. Some users actually sided with the employee. They argued that the guy just got the job. The interview passed. People thought he was worth that much. Why was it unfair when the whole system was already stacked against them?

Another angle emerged, focusing on the corporate culture. Some felt it wasn't really wrong for private companies to push this kind of pressure. They felt the pressure against salaries was just part of the deal.

Then you got the harsh pushback. One person was really angry. They hit on the disparity. They said, “Company had a budget. Guy had skills. Why is he crying? If he could crack a job with a three hundred percent hike, he was underpaid and exploited. Why does the last salary matter?”

There was a deeper shot fired there. Someone brought up executive pay. They argued about the huge gap between CEOs and average employees. They felt that disparity—the bonuses, the hours—was inherently wrong.

It got messy fast. People were celebrating the hustle. One commenter just wrote, “This man is a LEGEND 🫡.”

The debate kept spinning. It wasn't just about the individual. It became about the whole rotten structure.

Someone else tried to widen the scope. They brought up the sheer unfairness. They argued that underpaying workers while the top brass rake in salaries and bonuses is just fundamentally unethical. It felt like an exploitation of the entire system.

Written by Gree News Team — Senior Editorial Board

Gree News Team covers international news and global affairs at Gree News. Our collective of senior editors is dedicated to providing independent, accurate, and responsible journalism for a global audience.

#sensational#top news#global#trending

More from Top News

View All

Latest Headlines