World

Iran Pushes Back Against Claims of Strait of Hormuz Closure

Saturday, June 20, 2026
5 min read
Iran Pushes Back Against Claims of Strait of Hormuz Closure

The Iranian Foreign Ministry is pushing back against claims that the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz that critical energy corridor for the world has been shut down again. This followed reports stemming from an overnight Israeli attack in Lebanon, which threatened a ceasefire between the United States and Tehran.

Earlier news suggested the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) had ordered the strait closed once more. They accused the United States of breaking their understanding, that memorandum of understanding signed between Donald Trump and Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday.

The sticking point seems to be conditions for reopening things. The IRGC statement made it clear: "Since Israel pulled out of Lebanon, since they lifted the naval blockade, and since American forces withdrew from the Persian Gulf and the region those are the main requirements before we reopen the Strait of Hormuz." They basically said it stays closed until those terms are met.

They warned shipping explicitly: "All ships need to stay away from the Strait for their safety. Anyone who ignores this order will be targeted." It’s a very direct warning, isn't it?

But Iran’s side had a different take. The Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baqaei, later dismissed these reports about the closure entirely. He insisted that Iran has already taken steps to ensure safe passage following the US-Iran aGreement. Shipping is reportedly still moving through the Strait right now.

This whole situation seems layered with other conflicts. Fighting escalated in south Lebanon overnight. Lebanese authorities reported heavy Israeli air strikes across eleven towns since midnight, resulting in at least eighteen deaths and thirty-three wounded. It’s brutal.

The violence really spiked after the US-Iran deal was put into place to try and halt the wider war in West Asia. That deal was supposed to pause fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Netanyahu himself said that Israeli forces would stay in Lebanon "as long as necessary." He also vowed that Hezbollah would face a heavy cost for attacking Israeli soldiers.

Then there's the political friction behind it all. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi made some pointed remarks about this whole dynamic, referencing comments made by Israeli far-right minister Itamar Ben Gvir who had said "all Lebanon must burn."

Araghchi reacted strongly to that kind of rhetoric. He insisted it wasn't just some random outburst from a lunatic. He called it a public post by the national security minister of the Israeli regime, suggesting the entire structure in Tel Aviv is a threat to humanity. It’s all about permanent war, he said.

The US side also had its move on Thursday. Central Command announced they formally lifted their two-month blockade on Iranian ports. But even that felt incomplete. What exactly did they mean by removing the embargo? That part is still murky.

Meanwhile, if you look at the actual movement through the Strait itself, maritime trackers are showing some real change. Shipping traffic seemed to jump up significantly after the deal was struck. Data from tracking firms indicate commercial vessels crossed the strait at a rate that was highest in two months following the aGreement. Twenty-five commercial ships passed through on Thursday alone that’s more than the average daily count seen during the first ten days of June. It's a lot of movement right there.

Written by Gree News Team — Senior Editorial Board

Gree News Team covers international news and global affairs at Gree News. Our collective of senior editors is dedicated to providing independent, accurate, and responsible journalism for a global audience.

#sensational#world#global#trending

More from World

View All

Latest Headlines