India

Internal Political Friction: Dynamics within Congress and Trinamool Congress

Friday, June 12, 2026
5 min read
Internal Political Friction: Dynamics within Congress and Trinamool Congress

Rahul Gandhi and Abhishek Banerjee. Two names that really define this internal friction inside their parties. It’s not just political sparring. It’s something deeper. A constant sense of being pushed out.

A few years back, you had that whole "G-23" thing. That rebellion fractured the Congress from the inside out. Nobody explicitly told Rahul Gandhi to step down. But there was this massive feeling among the old guard the veterans who built the UPA, who brought the party back that they were being systematically kept out of where the real decisions were made. Why? It felt like an exclusion.

Sonia Gandhi did some ice-breaking meetings with some of the rebels. But she held firm. She just couldn't accept that her son was part of this structural problem. Eventually, the dissent just settled down. People like Ghulam Nabi Azad walked away. Others got quietly brought back in. Blood proved thicker than water, I guess.

Today? Rahul Gandhi is the center of gravity for Congress. Everyone else who left them now looks at Sonia Gandhi and accuses her of being consumed by putra moh . Blind maternal attachment.

Now look at the Trinamool Congress. The situation there feels strikingly similar. Abhishek Banerjee is the epicenter of a growing internal rebellion, too.

The latest casualty in this friction? Kalyan Banerjee. He was one of Mamata Banerjee’s most loyal defenders for a long time. Now reports are swirling that he just gave an ultimatum to the party supremo: it’s either the party or Abhishek. A stark choice hanging over him.

He isn't alone in feeling this way. Lots of those driving the recent mutiny point right at Abhishek’s top-down style. He acts like the main engine behind everything going wrong with the party lately. It’s the same dynamic we saw in Congress, just different players. The old leaders who gave their sweat and blood to TMC since the very beginning feel sidelined now. Their view is that Abhishek’s rapid climb completely changed what the organization actually is .

Mamata Banerjee herself is different. She usually relies on instinct. A fierce connection to what’s happening on the ground. But Abhishek? He seems disconnected from that grassroots mess. Critics see him as someone parachuted in more comfortable with boardroom politics, corporate management, and drawing boards than actual public mobilization. The party was built on that raw feeling: Maa, Maati, Manush. Now it feels like they’re just being run through consultants and metrics.

And even those who are the most critical of Abhishek still hold a piece of disappointment for Mamata herself. Insiders whisper she should have seen this coming. That her bhaipo could never be universally accepted by that battle-hardened old guard, couldn't manage it.

So, choosing between saving the party and saving her nephew? It’s an agonizing test for Mamata Banerjee. Sonia Gandhi faced a similar knot, but they handled it differently. The Congress absorbed the dissent and kept moving. But TMC? This feels like an entirely different kind of crisis. A much deeper one. Potentially existential.

For Mamata Banerjee, maybe blood wins over pure political pragmatism. But that cost to her legacy? That’s something you can never truly measure.

Written by Gree News Team — Senior Editorial Board

Gree News Team covers international news and global affairs at Gree News. Our collective of senior editors is dedicated to providing independent, accurate, and responsible journalism for a global audience.

#sensational#india#global#trending

More from India

View All

Latest Headlines

Internal Political Friction: Dynamics within Congress and Trinamool Congress | Gree News